20 Most Expensive Bollywood Flops of All Time

Bollywood, often known for producing some of the world’s most iconic and successful films, has also seen its share of box-office disasters. The combination of big budgets, star-studded casts, and extensive marketing does not always guarantee a hit. In some cases, the films end up being colossal failures, resulting in significant financial losses for producers and studios alike.

In this detailed blog, we will dive into the 20 most expensive Bollywood flops of all time, analyzing their budgets, box office performances, reasons for failure, and the valuable lessons they offer. These films serve as cautionary tales, reminding the industry that even with the best resources, a film can still crash and burn.

1. Bombay Velvet (2015)

• Budget: ₹120 crore
• Box Office Collection: ₹23 crore
• Director: Anurag Kashyap
• Cast: Ranbir Kapoor, Anushka Sharma, Karan Johar

“Bombay Velvet,” directed by Anurag Kashyap, was envisioned as a cinematic ode to the Bombay of the 1960s, focusing on themes of ambition, betrayal, and the underworld. Starring Ranbir Kapoor as an ambitious boxer, Johnny Balraj, and Anushka Sharma as an aspiring jazz singer, the films explored their lives intertwined with the evolution of the city.

The film had a stellar cast, a talented director, and massive production design, but failed miserably at the box office, grossing only ₹23 crore. Much of the failure was attributed to a convoluted script, underwhelming performances, and excessive stylization that took precedence over storytelling. Karan Johar, a well-known director and producer, was cast in a negative role, but his performance was widely criticized as miscast.

Reasons for Failure:

• Convoluted narrative: The plot was confusing and failed to emotionally engage the audience.
• Overly stylized direction: The film focused more on visuals and style than on a coherent and engaging story.
• Miscasting: Karan Johar’s portrayal of the antagonist was seen as unconvincing.
• Disconnected from mainstream appeal: The film catered to a niche audience and lacked the mass appeal needed to recoup its investment.

Lessons Learned:

Even with star power and lavish production design, a films needs a compelling, engaging narrative. It also highlights the risks of casting popular figures outside their typical roles without adequate justification in the story.

2. Thugs of Hindostan (2018)

• Budget: ₹310 crore
• Box Office Collection: ₹151 crore
• Director: Vijay Krishna Acharya
• Cast: Aamir Khan, Amitabh Bachchan, Katrina Kaif, Fatima Sana Shaikh

“Thugs of Hindostan” was expected to be a blockbuster given its massive budget and the presence of Bollywood legends Aamir Khan and Amitabh Bachchan. The films, set in the 18th century during British rule, followed a group of rebels fighting against the British East India Company. With grand action sequences, elaborate sets, and top-tier actors, the film had all the ingredients for success.

However, despite the hype, “Thugs of Hindostan” was a massive failure. The films was heavily criticized for its weak screenplay, lack of originality, and over-reliance on action and visual effects. Many compared it unfavorably to Hollywood’s “Pirates of the Caribbean” series, noting that it felt like a poor imitation without the necessary heart or character depth.

Reasons for Failure:

• Weak and cliched plot: The storyline was predictable and lacked innovation.
• Over-reliance on visual spectacle: The focus on action and visual effects took precedence over character development and emotional engagement.
• Aamir Khan’s performance: Khan’s eccentric character felt over-the-top and lacked depth.
• High expectations: The star-studded cast and massive budget raised expectations that the film couldn’t meet.

Lessons Learned:

Even the biggest stars and the largest budgets cannot compensate for a weak script. Films that heavily rely on visual spectacle must ensure that their story and characters are compelling enough to engage the audience throughout the runtime.

3. Zero (2018)

• Budget: ₹200 crore
• Box Office Collection: ₹90 crore
• Director: Aanand L. Rai
• Cast: Shah Rukh Khan, Anushka Sharma, Katrina Kaif

Shah Rukh Khan’s “Zero” was one of the most talked-about films of 2018. The film featured SRK as Bauua Singh, a dwarf from Meerut, in an unconventional romantic drama that blended heartwarming moments with larger-than-life sequences, including a trip to space. The films also starred Anushka Sharma as a scientist with cerebral palsy and Katrina Kaif as a troubled actress.

Despite its unique premise and groundbreaking VFX to portray Khan’s character as a dwarf, “Zero” failed to make an impact at the box office. Critics and audiences were divided, with many praising Khan’s performance but criticizing the film for its inconsistent tone, weak screenplay, and lack of emotional resonance.

Reasons for Failure:

• Inconsistent tone: The film oscillated between light-hearted romance and heavy drama, failing to maintain a cohesive narrative.
• Weak screenplay: The plot lacked clarity, and the transitions between major plot points felt forced.
• Over-reliance on visual effects: While the VFX used to depict SRK as a dwarf were impressive, they overshadowed the storytelling.
• Confusing second half: The plot took an unexpected turn with Bauua’s journey into space, which felt disconnected from the rest of the film.

Lessons Learned:

A unique premise and high-quality visual effects can attract audiences initially, but the films still needs a consistent tone and strong narrative to hold their attention. Filmmakers must ensure that the story flows naturally and that every plot element serves the overall narrative.

---

4. Ra.One (2011)

• Budget: ₹130 crore
• Box Office Collection: ₹114 crore (net collection in India)
• Director: Anubhav Sinha
• Cast: Shah Rukh Khan, Kareena Kapoor, Arjun Rampal

“Ra.One” was Shah Rukh Khan’s ambitious attempt at creating India’s first superhero blockbuster. The film featured cutting-edge special effects and a massive marketing campaign to promote SRK’s dual roles as G.One, the superhero, and Shekhar, a video game developer. The film’s antagonist, Ra.One, played by Arjun Rampal, was a rogue video game character who comes to life.

Despite the heavy promotion and massive budget, “Ra.One” failed to live up to expectations. Critics and audiences alike found the film’s storyline weak and the characters underdeveloped. The film was seen as focusing too much on special effects and action sequences, with little attention paid to the emotional arc of the story.

Reasons for Failure:

• Weak storyline: The plot was underdeveloped, predictable, and lacked the emotional depth required for a superhero films.
• Character development: Both G.One and Ra.One were one-dimensional, making it difficult for audiences to connect with them.
• Over-reliance on VFX: While the visual effects were impressive, they overshadowed the narrative, leading to an emotionally hollow experience.
• Forced humor: The film’s attempts at humor, especially targeting children, felt out of place and detracted from the overall experience.

Lessons Learned:

Visual effects and action sequences are important for a superhero films, but they cannot replace a strong, engaging story. Characters need to be relatable and emotionally grounded, and the plot must strike a balance between spectacle and narrative depth.

READ MORE: Is Virat Kohli the GOAT? A Comprehensive Analysis

5. Mohenjo Daro (2016)

• Budget: ₹115 crore
• Box Office Collection: ₹58 crore
• Director: Ashutosh Gowariker
• Cast: Hrithik Roshan, Pooja Hegde

Ashutosh Gowariker, known for directing historical epics like “Lagaan” and “Jodhaa Akbar,” turned his attention to ancient India with “Mohenjo Daro.” The film was set in the Indus Valley Civilization and starred Hrithik Roshan as a young farmer who travels to the city of Mohenjo Daro and uncovers secrets about his heritage.

Despite the historical setting and large-scale production, “Mohenjo Daro” failed to capture the imagination of audiences. The films was criticized for its lack of historical accuracy, predictable plot, and underwhelming performances. While Hrithik Roshan gave a competent performance, the film’s CGI and visual effects were seen as subpar for a historical epic of this scale.

Reasons for Failure:

• Historical inaccuracies: Scholars and history enthusiasts criticized the films for taking too many liberties with the historical setting.
• Predictable plot: The story followed a typical formula and lacked the complexity expected from a historical drama.
• Underwhelming visual effects: The CGI and set designs failed to create an immersive, believable ancient world.
• Weak supporting characters: The film’s supporting cast, including Pooja Hegde’s character, felt underdeveloped and failed to leave a lasting impression.

Lessons Learned:

For historical epics to succeed, they need a balance of visual grandeur, historical authenticity, and compelling storytelling. Audiences expect to be transported into the past with both accuracy and engaging characters. When a historical films relies too much on spectacle and neglects character depth or factual representation, it risks alienating both casual viewers and history buffs.

6. Tubelight (2017)

• Budget: ₹135 crore
• Box Office Collection: ₹119 crore
• Director: Kabir Khan
• Cast: Salman Khan, Sohail Khan, Zhu Zhu

Salman Khan, known for his massive box office appeal, took a departure from his usual larger-than-life roles with “Tubelight,” a heartfelt story set during the Sino-Indian war. Directed by Kabir Khan, the film was a remake of the American films “Little Boy,” focusing on a childlike man who embarks on a journey to find his brother after he is sent to fight in the war. Salman Khan’s character, Lakshman, was depicted as mentally slow but full of love and faith.

The film, however, failed to strike the emotional chord that it intended. While Salman Khan’s portrayal of an innocent, childlike man was praised by some, others felt it lacked conviction. The film’s slow pace and simplistic storytelling did not sit well with audiences used to seeing Khan in action-packed roles. Despite the emotional premise, the films did not resonate with the masses, resulting in an underwhelming box office performance.

Reasons for Failure:

• Unconvincing portrayal of the protagonist: Salman Khan’s attempt to play a childlike character felt forced and unnatural to many viewers.
• Slow pacing: The films moved at a sluggish pace, which tested the patience of audiences used to faster-paced dramas.
• Simplistic storytelling: The plot lacked the complexity or dramatic tension that viewers expected from a film set against a backdrop of war.
• High expectations: Salman Khan’s fanbase anticipated an action-packed film, and the divergence from his usual roles led to disappointment.

Lessons Learned:

Star-driven films often come with audience expectations, and when a major actor departs too far from their established image, it can alienate fans. Moreover, in a war-related drama, while emotional depth is important, a balance with pace and storytelling tension is necessary to keep the audience engaged.

7. Jagga Jasoos (2017)

• Budget: ₹131 crore
• Box Office Collection: ₹83 crore
• Director: Anurag Basu
• Cast: Ranbir Kapoor, Katrina Kaif

“Jagga Jasoos” was one of Bollywood’s more ambitious projects, blending adventure, mystery, and musical elements. Directed by Anurag Basu, the film followed Jagga (Ranbir Kapoor), a young detective with a stammer who sets out on an adventure to find his missing father. The film was unique in that it incorporated musical storytelling, with the characters often breaking into song to move the narrative forward.

The film faced numerous delays during its production, which caused a loss of momentum before its release. While Ranbir Kapoor’s performance and the innovative musical format were praised by some, the film’s unconventional narrative and uneven pacing left many viewers confused. Additionally, the long runtime and scattered plot led to a lack of engagement, and the film failed to appeal to a broader audience.

Reasons for Failure:

• Delayed production: The multiple delays in shooting and post-production led to a loss of interest by the time of its release.
• Unconventional format: The musical format and whimsical storytelling felt disjointed and didn’t appeal to mainstream Bollywood audiences.
• Inconsistent pacing: The plot was scattered, with the film moving too slowly at times, leading to audience fatigue.
• Niche appeal: The film’s quirky style and unique approach to storytelling limited its appeal to a more niche audience rather than mainstream moviegoers.

Lessons Learned:

Creative risks, such as blending genres or experimenting with storytelling formats, can either pay off or backfire, depending on execution. While innovation in filmmaking is crucial, balancing creativity with audience expectations is equally important to ensure broad appeal.

---

8. Besharam (2013)

• Budget: ₹85 crore
• Box Office Collection: ₹59 crore
• Director: Abhinav Kashyap
• Cast: Ranbir Kapoor, Pallavi Sharda, Rishi Kapoor, Neetu Kapoor

Following the success of “Dabangg,” Abhinav Kashyap attempted to bring another action-comedy to the big screen with “Besharam,” starring Ranbir Kapoor. The film was meant to be an irreverent, fun-filled entertainer, featuring Kapoor as a shameless car thief who eventually turns over a new leaf. His real-life parents, Rishi Kapoor and Neetu Kapoor, also played pivotal roles in the film.

However, despite the star power and the successful pairing of Ranbir Kapoor with his parents, the film failed to impress audiences. The film was heavily criticized for its crude humor, weak script, and over-the-top performances. Audiences found the storyline formulaic and lacking the charm of previous Ranbir Kapoor films. “Besharam” was unable to live up to its expectations, becoming a box office disappointment.

Reasons for Failure:

• Crude humor: The film relied too heavily on crass jokes and slapstick comedy, which alienated a significant portion of the audience.
• Weak script: The plot was predictable, and the story lacked the depth and humor expected from a film featuring such a strong cast.
• Over-the-top performances: Ranbir Kapoor’s character was too brash and didn’t showcase the nuanced acting he had become known for.
• High expectations: Coming off the success of films like “Barfi!” and “Yeh Jawaani Hai Deewani,” audiences expected more from Kapoor, leading to greater disappointment.

Lessons Learned:

Even with a bankable star and a successful director, a poorly written script can lead to a film’s downfall. Audiences, especially those familiar with an actor’s previous work, expect consistency in performance and storytelling quality.

9. Love Story 2050 (2008)

• Budget: ₹60 crore
• Box Office Collection: ₹18 crore
• Director: Harry Baweja
• Cast: Harman Baweja, Priyanka Chopra

“Love Story 2050” was one of Bollywood’s earliest attempts at a futuristic, sci-fi love story. Directed by Harry Baweja and starring his son, debutant Harman Baweja, alongside Priyanka Chopra, the film promised an ambitious portrayal of the future, with state-of-the-art special effects and a narrative set in the year 2050.

However, the film was widely criticized for its outdated special effects, weak plot, and lack of emotional depth. Harman Baweja’s performance failed to impress, and many critics noted that he lacked the screen presence needed to carry the film. Additionally, the film’s futuristic world felt half-baked, with the visual effects falling short of audience expectations, especially for a sci-fi film.

Reasons for Failure:

• Poor special effects: The VFX, which were supposed to be a selling point, were subpar and looked outdated even at the time of release.
• Weak debut performance: Harman Baweja’s acting was criticized for lacking charisma and failing to connect with the audience.
• Lack of emotional depth: The love story at the heart of the film was not compelling enough to engage viewers.
• Over-ambitious project: The film aimed to create a futuristic world but fell short in terms of world-building and technological depiction.

Lessons Learned:

Sci-fi films require high production values and strong world-building to be believable. In Bollywood, where sci-fi is still a relatively underexplored genre, such films need to be meticulously executed to attract and retain an audience. Also, launching a debutant in such an ambitious project carries additional risks.

10. Shaandaar (2015)

• Budget: ₹75 crore
• Box Office Collection: ₹43 crore
• Director: Vikas Bahl
• Cast: Shahid Kapoor, Alia Bhatt

“Shaandaar” was marketed as a whimsical, fairy-tale-like wedding film that brought together Shahid Kapoor and Alia Bhatt for the first time. Directed by Vikas Bahl, known for his critically acclaimed “Queen,” the film was expected to deliver a quirky, feel-good romance set against the backdrop of a big, fat Indian wedding.

However, despite the hype and the lead pair’s star power, the film fell flat. Audiences criticized the film’s disjointed narrative, lack of chemistry between the leads, and forced humor. The fairy-tale approach failed to create the magic it intended, and the film’s over-reliance on visuals and quirkiness without a strong emotional core was a key factor in its failure.

Reasons for Failure:

• Disjointed narrative: The story lacked flow, with several plot points feeling random and forced.
• Lack of emotional depth: The film’s attempt to be quirky and whimsical led to a lack of emotional resonance.
• Weak chemistry: Despite being a romantic comedy, the lead pair’s chemistry was underwhelming, making it hard for audiences to invest in their relationship.

• Over-reliance on visuals: The film prioritized aesthetics and quirky set designs over substance, leaving audiences with little to connect with emotionally.
• Forced humor: Many of the comedic elements felt out of place and did not land well with the audience, further detracting from the film’s appeal.

Lessons Learned:

Visuals and quirkiness are not substitutes for a strong narrative and emotional connection. In romantic comedies, chemistry between the leads and a well-constructed storyline are essential. Additionally, the film highlighted that whimsical storytelling needs to be grounded in character development to resonate with the audience.

11. Kites (2010)

• Budget: ₹90 crore
• Box Office Collection: ₹48 crore
• Director: Anurag Basu
• Cast: Hrithik Roshan, Barbara Mori, Kangana Ranaut

“Kites” was a highly anticipated cross-cultural romance film, starring Hrithik Roshan alongside Mexican actress Barbara Mori. Directed by Anurag Basu, the film aimed to blend Bollywood and Hollywood sensibilities, featuring dialogue in both Hindi and Spanish, and an international love story that crossed cultural boundaries. The film had high expectations due to its unique premise, international cast, and Hrithik’s star power.

However, despite its innovative concept, “Kites” crashed at the box office. The film was criticized for its weak, cliched plot, lack of chemistry between the leads, and a narrative that failed to engage audiences. While Hrithik Roshan’s performance was appreciated, the film’s convoluted storytelling and overemphasis on style over substance left viewers disappointed.

Reasons for Failure:

• Weak and predictable plot: The storyline was formulaic and lacked the depth needed for a cross-cultural romance.
• Lack of chemistry: Despite the hype around the international pairing, Hrithik Roshan and Barbara Mori’s on-screen chemistry was lacking, making the romance feel unconvincing.
• Language barrier: The extensive use of Spanish in the film made it difficult for Indian audiences to fully connect with the story.
• Overemphasis on style: The film focused heavily on its visual appeal but neglected character development and emotional depth.

Lessons Learned:

Cross-cultural films need strong character development and emotional engagement to bridge cultural and language gaps. Additionally, while style and visual appeal can enhance a film, they cannot replace a well-crafted story and convincing performances. The failure of “Kites” demonstrated the importance of narrative cohesion when attempting to appeal to both local and international audiences.

12. Kalank (2019)

• Budget: ₹150 crore
• Box Office Collection: ₹80 crore
• Director: Abhishek Varman
• Cast: Varun Dhawan, Alia Bhatt, Madhuri Dixit, Sanjay Dutt, Sonakshi Sinha, Aditya Roy Kapur

“Kalank” was an epic period drama set in the 1940s, boasting a massive ensemble cast, elaborate sets, and lavish costumes. Produced by Karan Johar’s Dharma Productions, the film was marketed as one of Bollywood’s grandest releases of 2019. The film explored themes of forbidden love, betrayal, and the socio-political landscape of pre-independent India.

Despite the visual grandeur and star power, “Kalank” failed to live up to its expectations. Audiences found the film overly melodramatic, with a slow-paced narrative that lacked emotional depth. The chemistry between the lead actors, particularly Varun Dhawan and Alia Bhatt, was seen as forced, and the film’s length further alienated viewers. Critics also pointed out that the film focused too much on aesthetics and not enough on storytelling.

Reasons for Failure:

• Overly melodramatic: The film’s tone was excessively sentimental, which felt outdated and failed to connect with modern audiences.
• Slow pacing: The film’s lengthy runtime and sluggish pacing made it feel tedious, resulting in audience fatigue.
• Lack of emotional engagement: Despite the film’s grand setting, the characters felt underdeveloped, making it difficult for viewers to connect with them.
• Misleading marketing: The film was promoted as an epic love story, but the narrative failed to deliver on this promise.

Lessons Learned:

A film’s visual grandeur and star-studded cast cannot compensate for a weak script and poorly developed characters. “Kalank” serves as a reminder that even epic dramas need strong emotional depth, compelling characters, and tight pacing to succeed. When promoting a film, it’s crucial to set realistic audience expectations in line with the final product.

READ MORE: Who Are the Best Indian Cricketers of All Time?

13. Saawariya (2007)

• Budget: ₹40 crore
• Box Office Collection: ₹39 crore
• Director: Sanjay Leela Bhansali
• Cast: Ranbir Kapoor, Sonam Kapoor, Salman Khan, Rani Mukerji

“Saawariya” marked the debut of two prominent Bollywood stars, Ranbir Kapoor and Sonam Kapoor, under the direction of Sanjay Leela Bhansali, known for his visually spectacular films. The film, an adaptation of Fyodor Dostoevsky’s short story “White Nights,” was a visually stunning love story set in a dreamlike world with ethereal blue and green tones. Bhansali’s signature visual style was on full display, with lavish sets and evocative music.

However, the film was a critical and commercial failure. While praised for its visual beauty, “Saawariya” was criticized for its slow pacing, weak plot, and lack of emotional engagement. Audiences found the narrative too abstract and struggled to connect with the characters. The film’s stylized approach ultimately overshadowed its storytelling.

Reasons for Failure:

• Weak plot: The film’s narrative was overly simplistic and lacked the complexity expected from a Bhansali film.
• Slow pacing: The film moved at a glacial pace, with long sequences that felt repetitive and tiresome.
• Abstract storytelling: The dreamlike, surreal setting alienated mainstream audiences, who found it difficult to engage with the story.
• Lack of chemistry: Despite the film’s romantic premise, the chemistry between Ranbir Kapoor and Sonam Kapoor was underwhelming.

Lessons Learned:

Aesthetic beauty and visual grandeur must be balanced with strong storytelling and character development. Films with abstract or surreal elements need to ensure that their narrative remains accessible to mainstream audiences. “Saawariya” proved that even visually stunning films require relatable characters and a coherent story to succeed at the box office.

14. Agent Vinod (2012)

• Budget: ₹65 crore
• Box Office Collection: ₹43 crore
• Director: Sriram Raghavan
• Cast: Saif Ali Khan, Kareena Kapoor Khan

“Agent Vinod” was intended to be Bollywood’s answer to the James Bond franchise, with Saif Ali Khan playing the suave, titular spy. Directed by Sriram Raghavan, known for his expertise in the thriller genre, the film promised high-octane action, exotic locations, and an engaging espionage plot. Kareena Kapoor Khan played the female lead, adding star power to the film.

Despite the buzz around its action-packed premise, the film did not perform well at the box office. Audiences and critics found the film’s plot confusing and disjointed. While the action sequences were praised, the lack of a gripping storyline and emotional depth made it difficult for viewers to remain invested. The film also suffered from uneven pacing, with too many subplots that detracted from the central narrative.

Reasons for Failure:

• Convoluted plot: The film’s narrative was too complex and confusing, making it hard for audiences to follow.
• Lack of emotional engagement: The characters felt underdeveloped, and there was little emotional investment in the protagonist’s journey.
• Uneven pacing: The film alternated between high-octane action sequences and slower, more tedious scenes, which hurt its overall flow.
• Missed expectations: Despite its grand action sequences, the film failed to live up to the expectations of being a Bollywood James Bond.

Lessons Learned:

Action alone cannot carry a film—especially in the spy genre, where the plot needs to be both engaging and comprehensible. Character development and emotional stakes are crucial to keeping audiences invested. Additionally, the complexity of the narrative must be handled carefully to ensure that it doesn’t alienate viewers.

15. Roy (2015)

• Budget: ₹50 crore
• Box Office Collection: ₹44 crore
• Director: Vikramjit Singh
• Cast: Ranbir Kapoor, Arjun Rampal, Jacqueline Fernandez

“Roy” was marketed as a romantic thriller, with Ranbir Kapoor playing the mysterious titular character, and Arjun Rampal and Jacqueline Fernandez playing the lead roles. The film had a unique narrative structure, intertwining two stories—one about a filmmaker (Rampal) making a movie, and the other about the film’s protagonist, Roy (Kapoor). The non-linear storytelling and the blending of fiction and reality aimed to create an intellectually stimulating experience.

However, despite its intriguing premise and star-studded cast, “Roy” failed to impress at the box office. Here are some of the reasons

• Confusing narrative structure: The film’s non-linear storytelling, while unique, ended up confusing the audience. The interweaving of the fictional and real-life characters made it difficult for viewers to follow the plot.
• Lack of emotional depth: The film’s characters, particularly Roy, were underdeveloped. Despite the central romance, audiences felt disconnected from the emotional stakes of the film.
• Underutilization of Ranbir Kapoor: Kapoor, heavily promoted in the marketing campaigns, had limited screen time, leading to disappointment among his fans who expected him to be more prominent in the storyline.
• Slow pacing: The film’s pacing was uneven, with long stretches that felt tedious, detracting from the thriller aspects of the story.

Lessons Learned:

Complex narrative structures need careful execution to avoid confusing the audience. Even when experimenting with storytelling formats, a film must provide clear emotional arcs and character development to keep viewers engaged. Additionally, marketing should align with the film’s actual content to avoid setting false expectations.

16. Mirzya (2016)

• Budget: ₹45 crore
• Box Office Collection: ₹11 crore
• Director: Rakeysh Omprakash Mehra
• Cast: Harshvardhan Kapoor, Saiyami Kher

“Mirzya” was a visually stunning attempt by Rakeysh Omprakash Mehra to retell the legendary Punjabi folklore of Mirza-Sahiban, weaving together elements of the past and present. The film, set in two timelines, portrayed a tragic love story with Harshvardhan Kapoor and Saiyami Kher in their Bollywood debuts.

Despite Mehra’s reputation for directing films like “Rang De Basanti,” “Mirzya” was a major box office failure. The film’s poetic, non-linear narrative and art-house sensibilities did not resonate with mainstream audiences. While the cinematography and music were praised, the lack of a strong narrative structure and emotional depth caused the film to falter.

Reasons for Failure:

• Abstract storytelling: The film’s nonlinear narrative and art-house style were too niche for mainstream Bollywood audiences.
• Weak debut performances: Harshvardhan Kapoor and Saiyami Kher’s performances lacked the emotional intensity needed for a tragic love story.
• Disconnected narrative: The film’s dual timelines and abstract portrayal of love confused viewers, making it difficult to follow the story.
• Niche appeal: While beautifully shot, the film’s artistic execution limited its appeal to a small, specific audience, rather than the larger, commercial Bollywood crowd.

Lessons Learned:

Films that blend art-house cinema with mainstream expectations must strike a balance to attract wider audiences. Even visually beautiful films require strong performances and a coherent storyline. For Bollywood debutants, an emotionally engaging narrative is crucial for gaining traction with audiences.

17. Bombay Velvet (2015)

• Budget: ₹120 crore
• Box Office Collection: ₹23 crore
• Director: Anurag Kashyap
• Cast: Ranbir Kapoor, Anushka Sharma, Karan Johar

“Bombay Velvet” was another highly anticipated film by director Anurag Kashyap, who attempted to recreate the jazz-filled world of 1960s Bombay (now Mumbai). The film followed the story of an ambitious boxer-turned-gangster (Ranbir Kapoor) and an aspiring jazz singer (Anushka Sharma), as their lives intersect with the corrupt underworld of Bombay. Karan Johar played the antagonist, marking his first major role as an actor.

Despite the high production values, elaborate sets, and glamorous portrayal of old Bombay, “Bombay Velvet” was a monumental box office failure. The film was criticized for its overly complicated narrative, lack of emotional engagement, and underwhelming performances. Additionally, Kashyap’s trademark gritty direction did not suit the big-budget, commercial appeal the film sought.

Reasons for Failure:

• Convoluted narrative: The plot was too complex, making it hard for audiences to follow the story’s emotional and thematic beats.
• Lack of mass appeal: Anurag Kashyap’s directorial style, which works well for gritty, indie films, did not translate well to a big-budget, mainstream film.
• Miscasting: Karan Johar’s portrayal of the antagonist did not resonate with audiences, and his acting was widely criticized.
• Overemphasis on style: While the film’s production design and aesthetic were praised, the focus on visuals came at the expense of storytelling and character development.

Lessons Learned:

High production values and visual style alone cannot guarantee success. A strong narrative structure, relatable characters, and emotional depth are essential for audience engagement, especially in big-budget films. Additionally, casting actors in roles that align with their strengths is crucial for a film’s success.

18. Aag (Ram Gopal Varma Ki Aag) (2007)

• Budget: ₹25 crore
• Box Office Collection: ₹7 crore
• Director: Ram Gopal Varma
• Cast: Amitabh Bachchan, Ajay Devgn, Mohanlal

“Aag” (also known as “Ram Gopal Varma Ki Aag”) was an ill-fated remake of the iconic 1975 film “Sholay.” Directed by Ram Gopal Varma, the film reimagined the classic with a modern twist, casting Amitabh Bachchan in the villainous role of Babban Singh (the counterpart of Gabbar Singh), and Ajay Devgn as Heerendra (Veeru in the original).

The film was a critical and commercial disaster, widely regarded as one of the worst Bollywood films ever made. Audiences and critics alike panned “Aag” for its poor execution, lackluster performances, and the audacity of attempting to remake a beloved classic like “Sholay.” Varma’s reimagining lacked the emotional resonance and cultural significance of the original, making it a colossal failure.

Reasons for Failure:

• Attempting to remake a classic: “Sholay” is one of the most iconic films in Indian cinema history, and the decision to remake it was seen as sacrilegious by many fans.
• Poor execution: The film’s direction, performances, and screenplay were widely criticized, with many calling it a pale shadow of the original.
• Miscasting: Amitabh Bachchan’s portrayal of Babban Singh lacked the menace and complexity of Amjad Khan’s Gabbar Singh, and the rest of the cast failed to live up to expectations.
• Negative critical reception: The film was universally panned by critics, which further discouraged audiences from watching it.

Lessons Learned:

Remaking a beloved classic comes with immense risks. It is important to respect the original film’s legacy and cultural impact, and unless a remake offers a fresh perspective, it’s often better to leave a classic untouched. Additionally, casting and execution must align with audience expectations, especially when dealing with iconic characters.

READ MORE : What Are Loop Earplugs: An Ultimate Guide to Comfort, Style, and Hearing Protection

19. Jagga Jasoos (2017)

• Budget: ₹131 crore
• Box Office Collection: ₹83 crore
• Director: Anurag Basu
• Cast: Ranbir Kapoor, Katrina Kaif

“Jagga Jasoos” was another ambitious project by Anurag Basu, blending elements of adventure, mystery, and musical storytelling. The film followed the adventures of Jagga (Ranbir Kapoor), a young detective with a stammer, who embarks on a journey to find his missing father. The film’s musical format was unique for Bollywood, with characters frequently breaking into song to convey emotions and move the story forward.

While “Jagga Jasoos” was praised for its creativity and Ranbir Kapoor’s performance, the film’s delayed production, disjointed narrative, and uneven pacing resulted in its commercial failure. Audiences found it difficult to follow the whimsical, non-linear storytelling, and the long runtime further dampened the film’s appeal.

Reasons for Failure:

• Delayed production: The film faced numerous delays during production, which affected its momentum and led to a loss of interest from audiences.
• Unconventional format: The musical format, while innovative, felt disjointed and confusing to mainstream Bollywood audiences.
• Inconsistent pacing: The film’s pacing was uneven, with long stretches that felt slow and meandering.
• Lack of broad appeal: The whimsical, offbeat nature of the film limited its appeal to a niche audience, rather than the mainstream crowd.

Lessons Learned:

While innovation in storytelling is important, balancing creativity with audience engagement is crucial for commercial success. Delays in production can also negatively impact a film’s reception, as prolonged hype often leads to inflated expectations. Films with niche appeal must carefully manage their narrative and pacing to maintain audience interest.

20. Panipat (2019)

• Budget: ₹92 crore
• Box Office Collection: ₹49 crore
• Director: Ashutosh Gowariker
• Cast: Arjun Kapoor, Kriti Sanon, Sanjay Dutt

“Panipat” was a historical epic that attempted to recreate one of the most important battles in Indian history: the Third Battle of Panipat fought in 1761. Directed by Ashutosh Gowariker, a filmmaker with a reputation for successfully handling historical dramas (“Lagaan” and “Jodhaa Akbar”), the film aimed to capture the grandeur of this massive conflict between the Marathas, led by Sadashiv Rao Bhau (Arjun Kapoor), and the Afghan invader Ahmad Shah Abdali, portrayed by Sanjay Dutt. The film also featured Kriti Sanon as Parvati Bai, Bhau’s wife, and was replete with battle scenes, lavish costumes, and elaborate sets.

Despite Gowariker’s pedigree, “Panipat” failed to perform at the box office. Critics appreciated the scale of the production and the attention to historical detail but criticized the film for its length, underwhelming performances, and uneven pacing. Arjun Kapoor’s portrayal of Sadashiv Rao Bhau was particularly criticized for lacking the gravitas needed to carry such a monumental historical character, and Sanjay Dutt’s portrayal of Ahmad Shah Abdali, though menacing, could not save the film from mediocrity. The film’s box office performance was further impacted by its competition with other releases and a lack of audience interest in period dramas at the time.

Reasons for Failure:

• Weak lead performance: Arjun Kapoor’s portrayal of the heroic Sadashiv Rao Bhau was seen as underwhelming, lacking the strength and charisma needed for a historical figure.
• Slow pacing and long runtime: The film was criticized for dragging in several portions, especially during the setup and post-battle sequences, making it tedious for viewers.
• Inconsistent screenplay: While the battle scenes were grand, the film’s script failed to build emotional depth or tension, and the interpersonal relationships between characters felt flat.
• Poor timing: The film faced stiff competition from other releases, which split the audience. Additionally, there was limited interest in large-scale period dramas at the time.
• Lack of mass appeal: Though historically significant, the Third Battle of Panipat may not have had the same widespread cultural resonance for audiences, making it harder to generate enthusiasm among the general public.

Lessons Learned:

Historical films require not just visual grandeur but also strong, emotionally resonant storytelling and powerful performances. Casting is crucial, especially for lead roles in historical dramas, where actors need to embody the strength and gravitas of their characters. Moreover, timing the release of such films in a way that avoids competition and aligns with audience tastes is essential to ensure box office success.

What is Learnt from the Expensive Bollywood Flops?

Bollywood is a dynamic and unpredictable industry, where even the most ambitious films—backed by high budgets, star power, and visual grandeur—can fail to resonate with audiences. As we’ve seen from these expensive Bollywood flops, several factors contribute to a film’s downfall, including weak storytelling, miscasting, poor execution, and unfulfilled audience expectations.

The common thread that runs through many of these films is the lack of balance between style and substance. While impressive sets, visual effects, and high production values can initially attract viewers, they cannot replace strong narratives, relatable characters, and emotional depth. Audiences crave stories that move them, performances that captivate them, and films that feel cohesive, no matter how ambitious or experimental the premise.

Key Lessons from Bollywood’s Biggest Flops:

1. Story is king: No matter how grand or visually stunning a film may be, if the story is weak or confusing, audiences will disengage.
2. Cast matters: Casting the right actors for the right roles is essential. Miscasting, especially in lead roles, can severely affect a film’s impact.
3. Balancing innovation with accessibility: Experimentation with narrative structures and genres can lead to either groundbreaking success or failure, depending on how well the balance between creativity and mass appeal is struck.
4. Pacing is critical: Whether it’s a period drama or a sci-fi adventure, pacing can make or break the viewing experience. Long, drawn-out scenes with no clear purpose can lead to audience fatigue.
5. Timing and marketing: Even a great film can fail if it’s released at the wrong time or is poorly marketed. It’s essential to position a film well within the competitive market and align marketing with what the film actually delivers.

These films serve as reminders that there is no fixed formula for success in Bollywood. While big budgets and star casts might provide an initial push, the film must ultimately connect with its audience on an emotional level to truly succeed. As the industry continues to evolve, these lessons will continue to shape the future of filmmaking, where story, character, and audience engagement reign supreme over spectacle.

You might also be interested in – 20 Famous Bollywood Love Stories That Met A Tragic End